PRIME: Probe-Based Identification of Metal-Binding Sites Using Deep Learning Representations
PRIME[1] is a hybrid deep learning framework that predicts metal-binding sites in proteins by combining protein language and structure models with a probe-based scanning algorithm. It outperforms existing methods across diverse metal ions and scales to AlphaFold2 and cryo-EM models.
Upload a structure file (PDB / CIF) or give a PDB / UniProt ID, pick a metal ion, and submit. Each run opens a dedicated, bookmarkable result page.
Accepts PDB, CIF, or ENT format.
or
PDB structures are fetched from RCSB[2]; UniProt accessions use the AlphaFold2[3] model.
Random orientations each probe is scored at (averaged). Higher = more robust, but linearly slower. Default 5.
Predictions currently run on a CPU server, so a typical job takes a few minutes. The result page shows live progress, can be bookmarked or shared, and is retained for one week.
How PRIME Works
Figure 1: Architecture of PRIME. PRIME-seq uses a protein language model to rank residues by binding propensity; a probe generation step turns the top residues into candidate sites, sharply reducing the search space; PRIME-probe, a 3D ResNet pre-trained on PDB structures, scores each probe's binding probability and refines its position; post-processing then clusters the probes into the final predicted sites.
Performance
Figure 2: Comparison across methods. (A) On zinc-binding sites PRIME attains the best F1 (0.892) against AllMetal3D[4], Metal3D[5] and BioMetAll[6], balancing precision and recall with low positional RMSE. (B) Across additional metal ions, PRIME (hard-mining and weighting variants) achieves the highest F1 scores for the broadest range of ions.
Supported Metal Ions
Transition metals
Zn2+Mn2+Fe3+Fe2+Cu2+Cu+Co2+Ni2+Cd2+Hg2+
Alkali & alkaline-earth metals
Ca2+Mg2+Na+K+
References
^
Xu, S.; Onoda, A. Probe-Based Identification of Metal-Binding Sites Using Deep Learning Representations. bioRxiv2025. DOI: 10.1101/2025.10.04.680417
^
Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res.2000, 28 (1), 235–242. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235
^
Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold. Nature2021, 596 (7873), 583–589. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
^
Dürr, S. L.; Rothlisberger, U. AllMetal3D: Joint Prediction of Localization, Identity and Coordination Geometry of Common Metal Ions in Proteins. bioRxiv2025. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.05.636627
^
Dürr, S. L.; Levy, A.; Rothlisberger, U. Metal3D: A General Deep Learning Framework for Accurate Metal Ion Location Prediction in Proteins. Nat. Commun.2023, 14, 2713. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37870-6